The Regulatory Commission has reduced the barriers to regulating the US proprietor suppliers leading to another service faster than a service.
In this regard, both have voted against three candidates in favor of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which changes the way governing the "Internet balance" called Net Nutrition.
Internet service companies can now increase or decrease the speed of different mergers. Furthermore, you can charge a fee for the service that customers use.
But they must do so.
Prior to the vote, Internet balance supporters took part in the fight against the change of the FCC building.
Many people argue that by changing the rules of the former US President Obama, the Internet will become less open and less accessible.
New York Attorney General Eric Schröderman announced that he would take up the case against the case, as the decision on the transition of the FCC already had a number of legal issues.
Eric, accused of failing to investigate the possibility of misuse of the practice of public opinion, has been criticized by some 2 million Internet accounts, including many of whom have been posted on the website.
FICCC Commissioner Michael O'Reilly, who advocated a counter-probe during the trial, said the staff would review them and remove the inappropriate comments.
Ajith Bag, Chairman of Central Information Commission, said that the change would bring innovation and encourage Internet service providers to provide quick connections to the people living in rural areas.
He also notes that this change is "restoring internet freedom".
Technically, instead of telecommunication, this decision can only be used to classify broadband internet as an information service.
The consequences are that the Central Information Commission and the Internet Service Companies are no longer directly regulated.
Instead, this authority will be given to the Association of Commerce. The main responsibility of the federation is to verify whether the companies are disclosing whether to discourage data, jamming or promoting Internet traffic.
"The change of the way we manage Internet balance is to harm the consumer, in favor of the corporations and the eradication of internet freedom," said Democrat Fillon Cliffen.
But Republican O. Reilly said, "The story of the Internet balance is" a story of horror for children of telecommunication giants ".
In this regard, both have voted against three candidates in favor of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which changes the way governing the "Internet balance" called Net Nutrition.
Internet service companies can now increase or decrease the speed of different mergers. Furthermore, you can charge a fee for the service that customers use.
But they must do so.
Prior to the vote, Internet balance supporters took part in the fight against the change of the FCC building.
Many people argue that by changing the rules of the former US President Obama, the Internet will become less open and less accessible.
New York Attorney General Eric Schröderman announced that he would take up the case against the case, as the decision on the transition of the FCC already had a number of legal issues.
Eric, accused of failing to investigate the possibility of misuse of the practice of public opinion, has been criticized by some 2 million Internet accounts, including many of whom have been posted on the website.
FICCC Commissioner Michael O'Reilly, who advocated a counter-probe during the trial, said the staff would review them and remove the inappropriate comments.
Ajith Bag, Chairman of Central Information Commission, said that the change would bring innovation and encourage Internet service providers to provide quick connections to the people living in rural areas.
He also notes that this change is "restoring internet freedom".
Technically, instead of telecommunication, this decision can only be used to classify broadband internet as an information service.
The consequences are that the Central Information Commission and the Internet Service Companies are no longer directly regulated.
Instead, this authority will be given to the Association of Commerce. The main responsibility of the federation is to verify whether the companies are disclosing whether to discourage data, jamming or promoting Internet traffic.
"The change of the way we manage Internet balance is to harm the consumer, in favor of the corporations and the eradication of internet freedom," said Democrat Fillon Cliffen.
But Republican O. Reilly said, "The story of the Internet balance is" a story of horror for children of telecommunication giants ".
Comments
Post a Comment