Have anyone ever walked at Rama Bridge?

The trailer of a TV show broadcast in the US has resumed debates about 'Rama Bridge' in India.

A channel broadcasting sciences programs in the United States broadcast a live preview of Twitter on the Ram's Bridge created by the stone linking India and Sri Lanka.

It was said that the bridge was used to build a bridge over the rocks of the bridge over a 30-mile highway.

According to Ramayana, Rama built a bridge to cross the river in the battle to recover his wife Sita from Ravan, the ruler of Sri Lanka and the head of the monarch. Ramayana is also said to have been constructed in the Ramayana. Ramayana means the story of Ramanan is not only in India but also in South East Asia.

Ramayana, its characters and their perceptions are all imaginable for a long time to say that the Rama Bridge is the source of their argument as a fantasy to say that it is a fairy tale,

These discussions, which occasionally emerge as rainforest, also have a boiling point of water. The screening of the show, currently on TV,

The Rama Bridge, supposed to be used for warfare, demons, and humans, has now stepped up the narrative between the leaders and political leadersThe Congress-led central government has rejected the Rama's bridge as it has been submitted by the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court.

Union Textile Minister Smriti Irani has been welcomed by the BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy on his twitter message, saying 'jai sri ram'.

The old debate is not just a bridge but a debate about it. In 2005, the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea were decided to carry out a plan to link the vessel without shipping around Sri Lanka.

During the first regime of the United Progressive Alliance, the green light was laid for the Sethu naval canal project of a 12 meter depth and a 300 meter wide canal.

Those who wish to implement a program that is slated said.

Hindu organizations came out of the temple with a tip, saying that the bridge would be damaged if the scheme was implemented.

India and Sri Lanka Environmentalists claimed that the project would affect marine life and marine environment in the Palk Strait and Mannar Gulf region. Britain's General Eddie Taylor, who worked in India in 1860, proposed the project.

The plan was dumped into a new project in 2005.

The petition was filed in the Chennai High Court against the proposed scheme. In the midst of the lack of scientific evidence to the facts mentioned in the Ramayana, the Congress government, which was in power at the Supreme Court,

The Archaeological Survey of India has issued a similar statement.

Hindu groups involved in the protests filed their petition. After that, the government quoted the "Kambayam Ramayana", ramana put forward the claim that Rama destroyed the bridge after the war with Ravana.

Thus the controversy has been extended to the Supreme Court.

It is not known when the show will be broadcast on the sciences channel, but the show's show has created a fierce debate.

According to the preview, the rocks on the Rama Bridge are seven thousand years old, but the sand is said to be 4,000 years old.

As the show's preview has shown that humans have built the bridge, the expectation has increased significantly before the show is broadcast.

What is the position of the Indian Archaeology

Department?
Is this the case of Indian archeology that has been so hotly debated?

From 2008 to 2013, he served as the Communications Officer of the Sethusamudram project at the Supreme Court. Roy. He has also worked as director of the National Monuments Authority.

According to these people, "Ram Bridge-related disputes, amplified, became then in this case anyone not want to interfere. Because the Supreme Court left this issue, people's feelings and the traditions associated with it. Such affairs, no one intervened in trouble not get into it," the Indian Archaeological Institute Rama Bridge to What is ID?

"No Indian has ever tried to study this, and there is no evidence to suggest that the bridge is man-made, and there is a need for new companies to enter such research." There is no evidence to say anything or yes, no basis evidence to say anything No, "says AK Rai.

If you go to Rameshwaram, there are a lot of thugs. "If the coral and silica stone is hot, it will begin to float, and this bridge was built and chosen by a stone," says Professor McConnell of History and Archeology.

"The bulk of the bridge was broken in a storm in the year 1480. It was earlier used by the people of India and Sri Lanka to walk through the wheel and wheel carriages," he said.

"It is the English that you say," Ramayana said, "Is it ever a legend?" "You can spread the word verbally in the world, as well as the stories spread." What about the writers who do not know what to write? " Archbishop Professor of History is an archeologist.

Now the debate has changed not only between educated and uneducated, but also among the mythical beliefs and the unbelievers, not for the Atheists and the Natics, and between science and beliefs.