Right-wing Hindu organizations and caste groups are fighting against Padmavathi film release across the country. For this reason, the film is postponed without specifying the date.
Why this problem? Why are they fighting against Padmavathi? Sudha G. Tilak explains.
Why this controversy?
Bollywood stars Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh have played important roles in this huge movie made by Sanjay Leela Bhansali in the 14th century Raja Rani Padmavathi and Muslim king Alauddin Khilji.
In this film we are misinterpreting Padmavathi, who is very respected. The Hindus and Rajput caste are also accused of being witnessed by him and his love for Allaudin Khilji.
But the producer of the film has denied this.
Padmavathi is not a true person in history. That character is a fiction. That hypothesis was written in the form of poetry.
The writer was Malik Mohammad Jayasi, a 16th century poet.
The poem was written in the language of the language after praising the virtue of Padmavathi, the poet who died after the husband was killed by her husband Alauddin Khilji.
After the death of her husband, the 'sati' is the death of her husband who died in the same pyre. This tradition is believed to have been created by the Rajputs over 700 years ago. Rajput girls took this practice to ensure that their husbands lost their rivals without any drawing of their dignity. A few years later, it was viewed as an aptitude. The British rulers have banned this practice by listening to the demands of the Indian Reformers.
Historians are describing this story as a controversial one. In their opinion, the Natakari story about Padmavathi sanctifies the conspiracy. These struggles show that worship among the Rajputs is still worshiped as the goddess Padmavathi.
Why the right wing Hindu groups oppose this image?
There is rumor that the screenplay shows that the Muslim king Khilji is in love with Padmavathi in his dream. It has angered many. Many organizations are fighting against the film. Rajaputra Carnegie Sena, an unconventional caste system, is an organization. The organization demands the film to be blocked.
Last week, this organization went to the shooting site and interrupted the shooting. At the beginning of the year, the same organization was the director of the film slapped Balzali.
The film's trailer struck the screening theaters and threatened to reap the naked throttle of Padukavatai as Raman's nose in the Ramayana.
This organization demonstrated in the BJP-ruled states of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana.
Rajput community burned the image of Bhansali. The film will not be released until the film is made with the necessary changes in the film, "Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje said.
The BJP leader's spokesperson declared that he would give 10 crore rupees to those who cut the heads of Bansali and Deepika.
The former royal families of Rajasthan have demanded to ban the release of the film. Mahendra Singh, one of them, has said that it is an art and historical fraud. It is the allegation that everyone in the dream scenes in this film has been portrayed badly.
Pansali is continuously refusing to have such scenes in the film.
But his refusal is just like a wage in a hearing ear. Anyone who wants to protect the sanctity of their queen has not heard of it.
At the same time, many have shared their shock against Deepika in the social media and the director of the film Bansal.
What do the historians say?
Historians have documented their opinions against the director and the crew of the film.
Irfan Habib, a historian from Aligarh Muslim University, is not a true character of Padmavathi, it is a fantasy character.
At the same time, liberals are accused of distorting Alauddin Khilji as a meat-eating drum in the preview of the film.Writer Devdat Patnaik accused Bansali of sanctifying the conspiracy.
What next?
The film, which was released on December 1, has been indefinitely postponed, according to Vigcom 18 media agency. Actress Shabana Azmi accused the BJP government and the ruling states of failing to provide security to the film.
Twinkle Khanna in his Twitter account said that the film is a big hit and that is the real replacement for the film.
Why this problem? Why are they fighting against Padmavathi? Sudha G. Tilak explains.
Why this controversy?
Bollywood stars Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh have played important roles in this huge movie made by Sanjay Leela Bhansali in the 14th century Raja Rani Padmavathi and Muslim king Alauddin Khilji.
In this film we are misinterpreting Padmavathi, who is very respected. The Hindus and Rajput caste are also accused of being witnessed by him and his love for Allaudin Khilji.
But the producer of the film has denied this.
Padmavathi is not a true person in history. That character is a fiction. That hypothesis was written in the form of poetry.
The writer was Malik Mohammad Jayasi, a 16th century poet.
The poem was written in the language of the language after praising the virtue of Padmavathi, the poet who died after the husband was killed by her husband Alauddin Khilji.
After the death of her husband, the 'sati' is the death of her husband who died in the same pyre. This tradition is believed to have been created by the Rajputs over 700 years ago. Rajput girls took this practice to ensure that their husbands lost their rivals without any drawing of their dignity. A few years later, it was viewed as an aptitude. The British rulers have banned this practice by listening to the demands of the Indian Reformers.
Historians are describing this story as a controversial one. In their opinion, the Natakari story about Padmavathi sanctifies the conspiracy. These struggles show that worship among the Rajputs is still worshiped as the goddess Padmavathi.
Why the right wing Hindu groups oppose this image?
There is rumor that the screenplay shows that the Muslim king Khilji is in love with Padmavathi in his dream. It has angered many. Many organizations are fighting against the film. Rajaputra Carnegie Sena, an unconventional caste system, is an organization. The organization demands the film to be blocked.
Last week, this organization went to the shooting site and interrupted the shooting. At the beginning of the year, the same organization was the director of the film slapped Balzali.
The film's trailer struck the screening theaters and threatened to reap the naked throttle of Padukavatai as Raman's nose in the Ramayana.
This organization demonstrated in the BJP-ruled states of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana.
Rajput community burned the image of Bhansali. The film will not be released until the film is made with the necessary changes in the film, "Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje said.
The BJP leader's spokesperson declared that he would give 10 crore rupees to those who cut the heads of Bansali and Deepika.
The former royal families of Rajasthan have demanded to ban the release of the film. Mahendra Singh, one of them, has said that it is an art and historical fraud. It is the allegation that everyone in the dream scenes in this film has been portrayed badly.
Pansali is continuously refusing to have such scenes in the film.
But his refusal is just like a wage in a hearing ear. Anyone who wants to protect the sanctity of their queen has not heard of it.
At the same time, many have shared their shock against Deepika in the social media and the director of the film Bansal.
What do the historians say?
Historians have documented their opinions against the director and the crew of the film.
Irfan Habib, a historian from Aligarh Muslim University, is not a true character of Padmavathi, it is a fantasy character.
At the same time, liberals are accused of distorting Alauddin Khilji as a meat-eating drum in the preview of the film.Writer Devdat Patnaik accused Bansali of sanctifying the conspiracy.
What next?
The film, which was released on December 1, has been indefinitely postponed, according to Vigcom 18 media agency. Actress Shabana Azmi accused the BJP government and the ruling states of failing to provide security to the film.
Twinkle Khanna in his Twitter account said that the film is a big hit and that is the real replacement for the film.
Comments
Post a Comment